Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Victim’s Age under POCSO Must Be Determined via JJ Act Section 94(2); Section 34 POCSO Confined to Juvenile‑Accused: Commentary on Murugesan @ Murugesh v. State (Madras High Court, 10 Oct 2025)

Victim’s Age under POCSO Must Be Determined via JJ Act Section 94(2); Section 34 POCSO Confined to Juvenile‑Accused: Commentary on Murugesan @ Murugesh v. State (Madras High Court, 10 Oct 2025)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Victim’s Age under POCSO Must Be Determined via JJ Act Section 94(2); Section 34 POCSO Confined to Juvenile‑Accused: Commentary on Murugesan @ Murugesh v. State Citation: 2025 MHC 2357 | Court:...
RTE and RPwD Acts Held Inapplicable to Sainik Schools: Madras High Court Upholds Non‑Negotiable Medical Fitness Standards and Estoppel Against Post‑Participation Challenges

RTE and RPwD Acts Held Inapplicable to Sainik Schools: Madras High Court Upholds Non‑Negotiable Medical Fitness Standards and Estoppel Against Post‑Participation Challenges

Date: Sep 26, 2025
RTE and RPwD Acts Held Inapplicable to Sainik Schools: Madras High Court Upholds Non‑Negotiable Medical Fitness Standards and Estoppel Against Post‑Participation Challenges Case: M.R. Yajith Krishna...
Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother

Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother Introduction This commentary examines the...
RPF Personnel Are Governed Exclusively by the RPF Act, 1957 and RPF Rules, 1987; Railway Servants (D&A) Rules, 1968 Inapplicable — Appellate Court Quashes Major-Penalty Proceedings for Minor Infraction, Delay, and Post-Retirement Futility

RPF Personnel Are Governed Exclusively by the RPF Act, 1957 and RPF Rules, 1987; Railway Servants (D&A) Rules, 1968 Inapplicable — Appellate Court Quashes Major-Penalty Proceedings for Minor Infraction, Delay, and Post-Retirement Futility

Date: Sep 24, 2025
RPF Personnel Are Governed Exclusively by the RPF Act, 1957 and RPF Rules, 1987; Railway Servants (D&A) Rules, 1968 Inapplicable — Appellate Court Quashes Major-Penalty Proceedings for Minor...
Once RTI Information Is Lawfully Disclosed, Its Sharing by an Employee Is Not “Unauthorised Communication” or “Official Document” Misconduct

Once RTI Information Is Lawfully Disclosed, Its Sharing by an Employee Is Not “Unauthorised Communication” or “Official Document” Misconduct

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Once RTI Information Is Lawfully Disclosed, Its Sharing by an Employee Is Not “Unauthorised Communication” or “Official Document” Misconduct Case: The Manager (TP-BPN), Bharat Heavy Electricals...
Mother as Natural Guardian Can Solely Consent to Minor’s Life‑Saving Renal Transplant; Hospitals Cannot Insist on Absent Father’s Consent: Madras High Court

Mother as Natural Guardian Can Solely Consent to Minor’s Life‑Saving Renal Transplant; Hospitals Cannot Insist on Absent Father’s Consent: Madras High Court

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Mother as Natural Guardian Can Solely Consent to Minor’s Life‑Saving Renal Transplant; Hospitals Cannot Insist on Absent Father’s Consent: Madras High Court Case: A. Kasthuri v. State of Tamil Nadu &...
Proportionality Anchored in Past Record: Madras High Court Affirms Dismissal for Repeated Insubordination and Reaffirms Prejudice Test for Non‑supply of Enquiry Report

Proportionality Anchored in Past Record: Madras High Court Affirms Dismissal for Repeated Insubordination and Reaffirms Prejudice Test for Non‑supply of Enquiry Report

Date: Sep 20, 2025
Proportionality Anchored in Past Record: Madras High Court Affirms Dismissal for Repeated Insubordination and Reaffirms Prejudice Test for Non‑supply of Enquiry Report Case: A. Shanthi v. State of...
Madras High Court narrows Special Court’s suo motu powers under the SC/ST Act: Administrative enquiry is sine qua non for Section 4; Externment under Section 10 demands a complaint/police report, area verification, and concrete likelihood of atrocity

Madras High Court narrows Special Court’s suo motu powers under the SC/ST Act: Administrative enquiry is sine qua non for Section 4; Externment under Section 10 demands a complaint/police report, area verification, and concrete likelihood of atrocity

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Madras High Court narrows Special Court’s suo motu powers under the SC/ST Act: Administrative enquiry is sine qua non for Section 4; Externment under Section 10 demands a complaint/police report,...
Madras High Court Narrows Bar Council’s Section 13 Enquiry: Multiple Associations at a Court Centre Permitted; Consultation with Rival Associations Prohibited

Madras High Court Narrows Bar Council’s Section 13 Enquiry: Multiple Associations at a Court Centre Permitted; Consultation with Rival Associations Prohibited

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Madras High Court Narrows Bar Council’s Section 13 Enquiry: Multiple Associations at a Court Centre Permitted; Consultation with Rival Associations Prohibited Introduction In Women Lawyers...
Madras High Court Clarifies Limits of Section 24 HMA: No Interim Maintenance for Financially Self-Sufficient Spouse

Madras High Court Clarifies Limits of Section 24 HMA: No Interim Maintenance for Financially Self-Sufficient Spouse

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Madras High Court Clarifies Limits of Section 24 HMA: No Interim Maintenance for Financially Self-Sufficient Spouse 1. Introduction Case: Dr. C. Amarnath v. Dr. J. Remabarathi Court: High Court of...
Privatisation of Municipal Sanitation as Policy: No Retrenchment Where Jobs Are Offered; Section 33 ID Act Inapplicable; High Court Orders Non‑Diminution of Wages and Preserves Workmen’s Legal Status

Privatisation of Municipal Sanitation as Policy: No Retrenchment Where Jobs Are Offered; Section 33 ID Act Inapplicable; High Court Orders Non‑Diminution of Wages and Preserves Workmen’s Legal Status

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Privatisation of Municipal Sanitation as Policy: No Retrenchment Where Jobs Are Offered; Section 33 ID Act Inapplicable; High Court Orders Non‑Diminution of Wages and Preserves Workmen’s Legal Status...
“Consultant-Negligence” as a Ground to Set-Aside GST Orders – A Comment on Chandrasekaran v. Assistant Commissioner (ST)

“Consultant-Negligence” as a Ground to Set-Aside GST Orders – A Comment on Chandrasekaran v. Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“Consultant-Negligence” as a Recognised Ground for Setting-Aside GST Assessment Orders – Madras High Court’s Decision in Chandrasekaran v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) 1. Introduction Chandrasekaran,...
“The Availability-of-Grounds Test” – Madras High Court Narrows the Scope for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions

“The Availability-of-Grounds Test” – Madras High Court Narrows the Scope for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“The Availability-of-Grounds Test” – Madras High Court Narrows the Scope for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions 1. Introduction Mirtunaj Kumar v. State of Tamil Nadu (2025 MHC 2029) presented the...
“Lack of Inquiry” vs. “Inadequate Inquiry” – Madras High Court Narrows Section 263 Jurisdiction in Arul Industries v. ACIT (2025)

“Lack of Inquiry” vs. “Inadequate Inquiry” – Madras High Court Narrows Section 263 Jurisdiction in Arul Industries v. ACIT (2025)

Date: Aug 12, 2025
“Lack of Inquiry” vs. “Inadequate Inquiry” – Madras High Court Narrows Section 263 Jurisdiction in Arul Industries v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (2025) 1. Introduction Court & Date: Madras...
The “Temporal Sanctity” Doctrine: Madras High Court Fixes Outer-Limit for Exhumation Requests

The “Temporal Sanctity” Doctrine: Madras High Court Fixes Outer-Limit for Exhumation Requests

Date: Jul 31, 2025
The “Temporal Sanctity” Doctrine: Madras High Court Fixes Outer-Limit for Exhumation Requests 1. Introduction In The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation v. S. Jaya (W.A. No. 3243 of 2024,...

“Breach of Undertaking by Advocate-Tenants: Madras High Court Lays Down a
Dual-Sanction Rule (Contempt + Bar-Council Action)” – Commentary on
P. Vikash Kumar v. A. Mohandoss (2025)

“Breach of Undertaking by Advocate-Tenants: Madras High Court Lays Down a Dual-Sanction Rule (Contempt + Bar-Council Action)” – Commentary on P. Vikash Kumar v. A. Mohandoss (2025)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Breach of Undertaking by Advocate-Tenants: Madras High Court Lays Down a Dual-Sanction Rule (Contempt + Bar-Council Action)” – Commentary on P. Vikash Kumar v. A. Mohandoss (Cont.P.Nos.985 &...
BNSS Section 528 Clarified: “Reasonable, Fact‑Based Apprehension,” Not Political Status, Governs Transfer of Criminal Cases

BNSS Section 528 Clarified: “Reasonable, Fact‑Based Apprehension,” Not Political Status, Governs Transfer of Criminal Cases

Date: Jul 1, 2025
BNSS Section 528 Clarified: “Reasonable, Fact‑Based Apprehension,” Not Political Status, Governs Transfer of Criminal Cases Decision: DR. RANGANATHAN v. DR. LAKSHMANAN, Crl.O.P. No. 17181 of 2025...
“No Caste – No Religion” Certificates: Madras High Court Affirms the Fundamental Right to a Casteless & Religion-Free Identity

“No Caste – No Religion” Certificates: Madras High Court Affirms the Fundamental Right to a Casteless & Religion-Free Identity

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“No Caste – No Religion” Certificates: Madras High Court Affirms the Fundamental Right to a Casteless & Religion-Free Identity 1. Introduction On 10 June 2025, a Division Bench of the Madras High...
Madras High Court Re-affirms Civil Court Jurisdiction over Contractual Unconscionability Claims Despite Competition Act Bar

Madras High Court Re-affirms Civil Court Jurisdiction over Contractual Unconscionability Claims Despite Competition Act Bar

Date: Jun 16, 2025
“In Personam vs. In Rem” – Madras High Court Carves Out a Jurisdictional Safe-Harbour for Contract-Based Challenges to Google Play Billing Terms 1. Introduction On 11 June 2025, the Madras High Court...
Reasonable Time-Limit for Continuation of Look-Out Circulars Against Non-Accused Foreign Nationals Without an Extradition Treaty

Reasonable Time-Limit for Continuation of Look-Out Circulars Against Non-Accused Foreign Nationals Without an Extradition Treaty

Date: Jun 5, 2025
Reasonable Time-Limit for Continuation of Look-Out Circulars Against Non-Accused Foreign Nationals Without an Extradition Treaty Introduction The Madras High Court in Karthik Parthiban v. The...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert